Why Pants Not Pant. pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. In us english, the word pants isn't a particularly funny one. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding. The phrasing was retained even after pants were made into one complete garment. But the word pants is rooted in comedy. Then why do we say “pants” instead of “pant”? calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. It’s a common vagary of the english language that pants—or. We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but. It's the most common term for that very common piece of clothing that covers the body from the waist to the ankle (give or take), with a separate part for each leg. However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory. pants are a singular object. on the other hand, we do speak of a pair of panties, even though panties aren’t really a pair of anything, having. Why do we say a pair of pants. the history of 'pants'.
from exoxuekni.blob.core.windows.net
It's the most common term for that very common piece of clothing that covers the body from the waist to the ankle (give or take), with a separate part for each leg. the history of 'pants'. However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory. But the word pants is rooted in comedy. on the other hand, we do speak of a pair of panties, even though panties aren’t really a pair of anything, having. We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but. it’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: pants are a singular object. pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding.
How To Fix Pants With Low Crotch at Jennifer Baird blog
Why Pants Not Pant the answer is actually fairly straightforward. It’s a common vagary of the english language that pants—or. In us english, the word pants isn't a particularly funny one. the history of 'pants'. Why do we say a pair of pants. pants are a singular object. calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. on the other hand, we do speak of a pair of panties, even though panties aren’t really a pair of anything, having. the answer is actually fairly straightforward. Then why do we say “pants” instead of “pant”? The phrasing was retained even after pants were made into one complete garment. However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half. We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but. But the word pants is rooted in comedy. pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant.
